In English


1. Matrix "DIFFERENT to "Matrix",  2000

On the recipe of gaining "freedom", given in the "Matrix" movie

file-doc in archive:  (79 kB)

html-file in archive:  (74 kB)

read in html-format

2.  Ford and Stalin.
How to Live in Humaneness

(Alternative principles of globalization)

St.Petersburg, 2004

file-doc in archive:  (1,42 Mb)

This work concerns the outlook on economy and social life belonging to two men who are usually thought to be very different. The first one is Henry Ford I, founder and head of «Ford Motors Company», one of the world’s largest automotive corporations. The other one is Joseph Stalin — a politician, sociologist and economist, whose world understanding and will were embodied in the foundation and prime of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the «superstate ¹ 2» of the 20th century, the «super concern» state.

Despite what used to be taught at schools about the fight between capitalism and socialism those two people share a similar view on normal social life. The difference lies in Henry Ford’s focusing mainly on microeconomy and relations between people as employees of a single enterprise, avoiding the issues of macroeconomy and building state institutions, while Joseph Stalin concentrated on the issues of developing political economy as a science, on cultural transformation and arranging the macroeconomy by the scheme of a «super concern» state, leaving the microeconomic issues to society’s creative force.

Thus they in fact complement each other and therefore pave the way to uniting the people of Russia and America as well as the people of the world in a common culture based on morals and ethics of a conscientious laborer.

But contemporaries as well as descendants refused to understand both of them. And the world has paid for this reluctance to understand with World War II followed by the «cold war» between NATO and the USSR and with the deformed globalization that is currently taking place.

Though this work quotes both Ford and Stalin extensively where it is necessary, those are merely quotations. Their heritage should be studied not by quotations but by their works in order to form a complete and coherent understanding of who and in what way was wrong or right.

But if the heritage of Ford and Stalin is understood, expanded and realized then the historic perspective of all peoples will acquire a new, a better quality...

The Russian original of the book see here.

3.  Egoist is like one sitting for long in a well

September 19-29, 1998

file-doc in archive:  (35 kB)

Global sociology as seen from the heights of the US "high" political analytics: on Z.Brzezinski's book "The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives". — M. International Relations.1998.

4.  In Quest of National Idea:
«Energy Ruble» Bound To Be the Hardest Currency

Victor Efimov
May 6, 2004

Article in newspaper «Chas pik» (Saint-Petersburg)

5.  Ñomment on the present situation, N10
(October 2002)

MS Word format (22 kB) , Rtf format (18 kB)

Calling things by their proper names. 1. What they urge to do in their appeals. 2. The essence of the Russian-Chechen relationship problem. 3. Jihad. 4. Every people has a government slightly better than it could have been.

6. To Understanding of Macroeconomó
of State and World


Both existing and possible economic theories may be ranged into one of the two following categories:

7.  G8 Summit in Strelna and the possibilities of a new global politics




  1. The transformation of G7 into G8: goals and result
  2. G7 or UN => Gx + UN?

8.   The Future of the Humankind: The Dictatorship of Conscience or the Tyranny of Bible Owners


September 28, 2006



  1. Is the conscience free within the traditional confessions?
  2. God is the best of planners…
  3. Conjecture will not avail aught against the truth…
  4. Why are hierarchs of churches against the Rightness-Truth?
  5. The task is to prevent from unleashing the new world war on the basis of interconfessional enmity.